Quote:
Originally Posted by zoaElite
The filter sock would loose efficiency because it requires high flow to capture as much particulate as possible.
|
It does? how does that work, it is a filter, why so much flow the water falls out of the overflow box at a constant unless you are running a siphon ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by zoaElite
You keep restating your point, your logic is understandable but I need some concrete proof (And no I'm not going to call Euro reef and ask them) before I believe it.
|
As Jack Nicholson would say "you can't handle the truth"
Quote:
Originally Posted by zoaElite
The reason I don't believe you is because I own a skimmer, I have 7X turn over in my main tank and still get a very large amount of skimmate production.
|
as compared to what?
Quote:
Originally Posted by zoaElite
If I slowed the flow down even more to the sump would I get more concentrated skimate...? I highly doubt it, again nutrients don't only exist on the surface they are mostly found dissolved in the water column.
|
Of course you will, if you slow it down by half the surfactants delivered to the skimmer will be double in the same time frame
Quote:
Originally Posted by zoaElite
Considering that letting your skimmer have more access to the polluted water makes more sense.
|
That is the point.