Quote:
Originally Posted by FitoPharmer
that's fine, i just want to know what science? what specific piece or pieces of science makes your decision based on evidence? all i have been asking all along is i would like to see this science. so far what i have seen makes me believe the swine flu shot is not worth the associated risks considering the meager benefit. and until i see proof that says other wise my mind wont be changed, i'm sorry.
|
Unfortunately, the evidence I could provide is from scientific journals based on research that is often funded by the government or by industry who are all part of the conspiracy.
Skepticism is fine and an open mind is a neccesary skill in a scientist. Sometimes a new discovery goes very much against our current thinking.
Science does not have all the answers. New experiments or new technology sometimes results in a completely different way of thinking of things.
However, any results must be repeatable and falsifiable.
Vaccine caused you to grow an extra big toe? Show that can happen again and again - except this time under controlled conditions so we know it was the vaccine and not something else. No evidence the vaccine causes you to grow an extra toe? Accepted until there are studies that would indicate something to the contrary.
To true believers, evidence not supporting their ideas is minimalized. They attack the evidence presented rather than providing evidence of their own.
So if you do not accept all the evidence presented to you - what evidence do you have? (and no more youtube or wikipedia)
And Occam's Razor was used to illustrate that between the theory that the pharmaceutical companies engineered H1N1 and released it to increase profits or that it is a naturally occuring pandemic - the former is not very likely.