Sorry for the confusion bad wording choice on my part. I do believe that there needs to be proof prior to some one being arrested I just feel that there are too many of the loop holes that you refer to. I agree that the general population does respect the police and I do not think that anyone should fear them. However it is the criminal who does not respect the police and is free to tell me to go #%&* myself because he says I put the handcuffs on to tight and he is going to complain, sue me and have my job. It is not the general public that causes the problem and it is not the people that the police need to have more power and control over, it is the criminal that is arrested and has more rights than the police officer who arrested him that is the problem.
Quote:
|
I hope you are just saying this out of fusteration and don't realy mean it.
|
Alot is frustration. When you see someone with a record that includes numerous assault convictions and assault on police officer convictions that have recieved a $100 fine for each offence walking around the day after you arrested him and he fights with you it is very frustrating.