View Single Post
  #62  
Old 05-09-2003, 05:46 PM
StirCrazy's Avatar
StirCrazy StirCrazy is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Kamloops, BC
Posts: 7,872
StirCrazy is on a distinguished road
Default

Just a couple notes I feel should be added here.

1, exelent info link but it does show that compard against MH lighting to acheive the same amoun t of light T5's will cost more to buy and will cost more to run. So there is no cost benifit when compard to MH.

2, the T5's that are being hyped are not the same T5's you can buy in a hardware store, but rather a HO version of the T5. I think a standard T5 for a 48" bulb is rated at 28 watts, but the HO T5 that the aquarium industry is trying to push now is a 54 watt or higher tube. same idea as NO T12 and VHO T12.

I have looked into the T5 stuff and as it sits right now you can get the tubes and such from some lighting places but they are not easy to get or cheep enuf throught comercial lighting suppliers at this time to make it worth the trouble as they are not ordering a large enuf amount to get the good price breaks.

I am thinking about bringing in a couple to try on the bottom tank as the PC's on there will need to be replaced pretty soon. This way I will be able to do some testing on the PAR output of them against other types of lighting.

Steve
__________________
*everything said above is just my opinion, and may or may not reflect the views of this BBS, its Operators, and its Members. If cornered on any “opinion” I post I will totally deny having ever said this in a Court of Law…Unless I am the right one*

Some strive to be perfect.... I just strive.
Reply With Quote