View Single Post
  #17  
Old 12-30-2008, 03:32 PM
Canadian's Avatar
Canadian Canadian is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Victoria, BC
Posts: 619
Canadian is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by StirCrazy View Post
in one form of green and a couple Orange.

the point is that I can take my PAR meter and put it 2" from a 250 watt HQI and it is still less par than Victoria gets in the winter on a rainy day.


all those charts on photo inhibition are great, but they are all missing one important piece of info (I just spent the last 2 hours reading and trying to find it) time, so if I shine this light on my corals how long until i reach this magical point?

this is very useful as what it would allow you to do is run some lower powered lights like T5's for the bulk of the day and then just have you MH come on for 2, 4, 6, or what ever time is required to reach the saturation point which could potentially save money.

I have been following these articles for years, I believe they started coming out in 02, but some of the others are 04. they all say the same thing and nothing at the same time. take this scenario for instance. you have a 30" wide tank, that is 18" deep and 12" wide (just picked that size as it is what I am building) I am going to run two T5's for actinic which will run 12 hours a day. I am looking at running a 250 watt SE bulb driven by an electronic HQI ballast. the bulb orientation will be in the middle of the tank front to back. and run 8 hours a day

Ok do you believe that if I take corals and put them all over that tank that they are all going to reach saturation? I would guess that it will be less than 10% of the tank is going to receive enough light to do that.

I enjoy reading the articles on line but remember that none of these have gone through peer review and that most of them are rehash of several older documents in the authors opinion. Not to say they are wrong, but we are only seeing a narrow chunk of info here. If you want to dig around there are several other good articles on lighting including a few on how to increase the amount of light in a tank with out reaching the saturation point by cycling the lights on and off for periods of time. this one formed the basis of the way I do new light acclimation and I have never seen better results. If I didn't have to buy a new computer as my old one had a melt down I would be able to give you links but they are lost to me and I haven't had the time to re find them.

another thing to consider, for the bulk of people who upgrade there lights have you ever heard anyone say "I have to much light" or "my coral growth slowed down when I put the 400 watt radiums on"?

when I started my last tank, lighting was a mystery.. Dana and those were not doing any reporting or anything at that time so we didn't even have basic articles to re-fur to.. at the same time I don't think it is a realistic set up that blasts a 400 watt iwasaki over a 12" deep tank, maybe I am wrong

info on lighting has come a long way in the last 9 years which is good. but there are new things that are more important than, which light and do I have to much, like water flow. this is probably the most overlooked thing in reef tanks and the hardest to set up properly, but I see there are a few articles out on it now which is good.

Steve
Here's a discussion where you'll find that photoperiod has no impact on photosaturation - the conclusion is that it is purely intensity dependent and has nothing to do with photoperiod. The link is not a peer reviewed journal article but the information is posted by a MSc. Marine Biology student. He notes that your assumption that photoperiod some how affects photosaturation is a commonly held myth within this hobby:

http://reefcentral.com/forums/showth...hotoinhibition

And here's a peer reviewed journal article showing that at some of the highest PAR values in tropical reefs the species of coral under investigation was not able to photoadapt (analogous to acclimating in an aquarium) to the high levels of light and exhibited photoinhibition at middday when the PAR levels were greatest (it also shows some other interesting things related to fluorescence at different PAR levels). Also note that the upper values of measured PAR in this study were around 1100 which are readily achieved in a typical aquarium with 2 x 250W MH:

http://www.aslo.org/lo/toc/vol_48/issue_4/1388.pdf


And for what it's worth I definitely agree that we need to pay more attention to flow in our aquariums and match it to our light intensities.
__________________
SPS Dedicated 24x24x20 Trimless Tank | 20 g Sump | Bubbble King Mini 160 Protein Skimmer w/ Avast Swabbie | NP Biopellets in TLF Phosban Reactor | ATI Sunpower 6 x 24W T5HO Fixture | EcoTech Vortech MP20 | Modified Tunze Nanostream 6025 | Eheim 1260 Return Pump | GHL Profilux Standalone Doser dosing B-Ionic | Steel Frame Epoxy Coated Stand with Maple Panels embedded with Neodymium Magnets

"Mens sana in corpore sano"

Last edited by Canadian; 12-30-2008 at 03:35 PM.
Reply With Quote