Quote:
24stormHave you seen Gregs (snappy). It is not that complex. It is very impressive and i think the only thing he has on your list is he doses poly labs. No reactor no Zeovit No wave maker.
Correct me if I'm wrong Greg.
Keith
|
Thanks Keith and you are correct, my set-up is embarrassingly simple.
Quote:
|
mseepmanI agree....I just saw Greg's tank in person last weekend, it was awesome to behold and he follows the old KIS (keep it simple) methods it seems. I couldn't believe that he doesn't have a calcium reactor....
|
Thank you Mark, yes I am a "kiss" kind of guy. Mostly because I'm too dumb for complicated stuff.
Quote:
|
kwirkyI keep meaning to go see greg's tank. school's been SO busy lol.
|
Sean you are welcome any time.
Quote:
Greg might not have a "wavebox", but he does have appropriate flow conditions in his tank. And there is a wave like effect happening in his tank. When it comes down to it, flow is probably the most important aspect to a tank like this (lighting and nutrient management and parameter levels do count as very close seconds though). I don't know what his total volume turnover is but it has to be fairly significant.
Zeovit, compound lighting .. ah .. well ... no, none of it is specifically mandatory but the end results that they provide kind of are. I don't mean to say that a dosing system like Zeovit or Polyplaps is mandatory, it's just a tool in the arsenal against nutrient buildup. If you can manage it otherwise, then you're set. However one nice thing about those systems is that they have the side effect of feeding the corals AND making a low nutrient system. So, no it's not mandatory, but boy is it addictive when you see what you can achieve with it.
|
Tony, yes I do have reasonable flow however with a heavily stocked sps tank it needs to be upgraded and tweeked at least every 6 months to a year as the corals grow and block flow, creating some "low flow" areas. This is where a wave box would be handy as even with some blockage there is still the surge of water movement. Dosing "reef-resh" allows me to stock on the heavy side but keep the nitrates lower. Having a large over-rated skimmer doesn't hurt either. I am actually considering a calcium reactor soon so things will be more automated. The drawback to the dosing pumps is mineral build up causing a little more maintenance and something needs to be installed into the dosing buckets to keep things stirred and in solution. There are ways around this though so I haven't decided for sure which way I am going to go. The other thing with automated dosing is I would make a min of 5 gallons at a time so it would require a fair bit more space than a reactor. For dosing right now what I do (talk about simple) is I take two 500 ml cups set on a rack over my sump with a pin hole in the bottom's and each day fill up one with ca solution and one with alk and they dose the tank drop by drop over several hours.
Long story short, are the "gadgets" necessary? no. Convenient? yes.
Sean you mentioned TOTM for Advanced Aquarist & Reef Keeping online magazines in your first post. Ironically at the moment my tank is actually being featured in AA however I think it unlikely RC(reef keeping) would give me the same invitation. They had actually sent me a notice that my tank was nominated there but I think it will go nowhere. They are very big on the "high end" tanks with more equipment than I use. Since they are a world class site I think it is only right they should concentrate on what can be achieved with the proper equipment and help others aspire to new heights. I'm not sure they need to make room for low tech tanks when they have so many awesome tanks from around the world to choose from.
Sean, sorry I didn't mean to hijack your thread but since my tank came up I thought I would jump in. Anyway thanks for the kindness from those that posted nice things about my humble set up.
All the best,
Cheers