Quote:
Originally Posted by Der_Iron_Chef
I don't see why your idea won't work. It might just be a little tricky at first to adjust flow rates with those ball valves (urrgh, they're a bit of a PITA).
I know what you mean about the strainer. You don't have an overflow chamber, just a hole drilled in the back of the tank with a strainer fitting on the inside to keep fish and other things from being sucked in.  |
Precisely...a PITA. That's why I'm here...hoping someone has some brilliant idea I haven't thought of yet.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Brent F
It was prone to leaking so I replaced the complex plumbing with a separate system - basically two independently plumbed tanks sharing a common sump. This works better because it is simpler and I can turn off the circulation to the two tanks independently.
|
I thought of that, but I'm not too keen on using a second return pump (noise). But it IS another good idea... thanks!