Thread: canucks lose
View Single Post
  #15  
Old 05-05-2007, 12:16 AM
andsoitgoes's Avatar
andsoitgoes andsoitgoes is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Secret Location
Posts: 433
andsoitgoes is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DiscusZ View Post
Well Fluke or no fluke Luongo should of concentrated on the puck rather than waving at the ref. He caused the canucks the game right there,


The play according to anyone was a fair legal hit If you take a look at the replay he had his head down along the boards and got nailed I just watched it again definate a clean hit.


Also those who are complaining about the Ducks 1st goal. Didnt vancouver do this toward the end of the season to Calgary? and actually get a goal that way? I am sure it was naslund who dove on Kipper and the puck went in..

well the canucks can hit the links and the playoffs move on..

Lets go Ottawa. I would lov e to see the finals being Ottawa and the Sharks
whoa whoa whoa now.

Not to create a fight - but you're blaming probably the #1 reason that the Canucks have done SO well for making ONE mistake?

Luongo didn't cost them squat, their absentee playing is what cost them. Maybe he made a mistake, but the other players on the team have been making mistakes all along. I think the guy deserves a beer and a pat on the back for having to do so much bloody work. Blaming him simply isn't fair or right, that may just be my opinion, but really now..
Reply With Quote