I'll try to dig up the link where I read it, but someone actually did a study and caught all their return water in a micron sock and then examined all the pods.  Their findings were that the pod-vs-impellor mortality rate was very very low.  It was something like only 5% of pods are killed by going through the impellor.   
I don't know where the idea that a refugium should be low-flow came from, but I personally don't see the benefit.  My 20gal display had 40x turnover and it was crawling with pods.  If you have pods that are being blown away, then you might have a velocity problem, not a turnover problem.  Infact, have you ever tried to purposefully blast a pod into the water column?  You have to sneak up on it with a powerhead to do it.   
You may have to change the name to "sump-with-liverock-chaeto-and-pods" instead of a "refugium" to make people more comfortable, but as far as I know, it will be healthier with a higher turnover than it will with a lower one - just like your display.  In fact, my 20gal display had a 40x turnover because of the sump return and a closed loop - but my sump only had the return pump driving it so it's turnover rate was half that... so what did I do?  I added a small powerhead to the sump.  The LR and chaeto didn't "know" it was in a refugium - so it still benefited from better water movement just like it would have in the main tank. ( : 
Haha I guess an extreme example is my cannister filter mod that turned a 1.6gal eheim 2028 with an output of 250gph into a "refuguim".  I added lights, LR, and cheato to the inside of the filter and it became a breeding ground for pods - despite having a volume turnover rate of approx 156x!!!    
- Chad 
		
	
		
		
		
		
			
				__________________ 
				Returning to the hobby after an eight year absence.
			 
		
		
		
		
		
						  
				
				Last edited by Fish; 10-23-2006 at 07:12 PM.
				
				
			
		
		
	
		
		
	
	
	 |