View Single Post
  #9  
Old 03-13-2006, 07:50 AM
jws444 jws444 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 94
jws444 is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by fortheloveofcrabs
Higher K, more watts. Simple. I have a 16 gal nano with a 175 watt 20k and it looks great, and growth is good (1 polyp candy has grown to 19 polyps in 8 months, 1 polyp torch to 4 polyp in 6 weeks). I am upgrading a 400 watt 20k so I can keep SPS corals (I say Josh's cat's paw and fell in love!) But that's my 2 cents... 20k all the way!

-Pauli

The temperature rating of a bulb has no correlation to wattage. A bulb consuming 175 watts will remain the same regardless of the bulb's kelvin rating.

Personally, I find 20k kelvin bulbs are decent looking on well stocked tanks. If you're running a 'bare bone' tank with not much live rock and corals, then you'll get nothing but glowing blue sand. It is really preference. Take up some of the member's offers and go take a look. It's the only real reference you'll be able to get.
__________________
George

Last edited by jws444; 03-13-2006 at 07:52 AM.
Reply With Quote