Fish,
I think Bob does use the colour of skirt, mouth, etc. method rather than the "marketing" names that sound cool but may mean different things to different people. In the future, if some written convention or methodology is used to classify zoo varieties that most people can agree on, then those fancy names will be useful. From his post, his point seems to be that there is not enough of a consensus to definitively state that a green and yellow zoo is a "Green Bay Packer" vs an "Edmonton Eskimo" zoo because there's no science behind the name, just regional preference.
At this point, I would just like to know if the descriptions used to name/identify a particular type of zoo as a "fire" or some other marketing name is done under what type of lighting because many of my zoos & palys change colour depending on whether its pure 10000k or with actinic or just actinic or under moonlights, etc. I'm assuming the colour descriptions are under 10000k but does anyone know for sure?
Anthony
|