![]() |
quick par readings
i received my par meter a few weeks ago but i havnt done much except play with it here and their, on boxing day i bought new bulbs so i did a quick before and after so i could see the differences, the old bulbs are about 10 months old
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v508/djdirtyc/par.jpg the one at the top is at water level and the anemone is about 12-13" down and the bottom is 28" the light is on the tek legs all the way down which is about 6" off the water the light is a 48"tek with 8 bulbs 1xatinic 1x22k 2x10k 1xcoral light 3xfiji purple ive had great growth with this light and have been very happy with it, |
little hard to see the number but if you look hard you can, also here is a link for reference
http://melevsreef.com/par_readings.html i have the same meter as the one used here |
Cool. Here are my readings:
http://www.canreef.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=47893 This particular PAR meter is making the rounds around the GVRD right now so hopefully we'll have others post their results and we can dispel (or confirm) some lighting "rules" and generate some objective numbers from which we can derive some conclusions. |
This is really informative!
How long generally do you run your lighting? |
Quote:
other things i tested was a 150w coralife(just the mh bulb) brand new 10k bulb was putting out 350 at the surface and only 100 about 10"down 29g biocube with older bulbs was giving out 80-90 half way down so mabey 8" or so |
well its been 2 months since i changed the bulbs in my tek light so i did some more tests,
i also tested my new cube, thier are 2x 4bulb 24" tek fixtures so 8 bulbs total same as my reef just 24" vs 48" when i tested the reef the first time i dropped the legs to the lowest point so it would be the same always now i dont know what the heck happened maybe i had the fixture slid forward or back differently but the numbers seem better this time around, could be the clarity of the water maybe also, the spots tested might be slightly different but its just a reference so its not exact, the light on buth tanks was 4.75" off the water on the reef tank 990-surface 525-12" 410,350 on the right- 17" 350 on the left -19" 360,290- 21" 310-26" bottom of the tank http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v5...arreadings.jpg the new cube- the water is less that perfectly clear but good still 625-surface 260-8" 240-12" 220-15" 190-21" http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v5...arreadings.jpg |
Interesting that the 48" length makes such a difference in T5's.
|
ya wish i knew before, when ive seen par numbers on certin bulbs it's never said a size so i figure they would all be the same or at least close,before the tank even had water in it i knew it wasnt even gonna be close
|
Does the surface agitation change any of the numbers? I noticed you have a lot of surface movement on the cube with the low numbers,and the other tank looks a lot calmer. I'd wonder how the physics of light refraction really matters. I've always tried to keep my surface agitation down for this reason. Hmm Myth?
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 01:31 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.