My new sulphur denitrator setup
 

Well I've finally recieved my new sulphur denitrator.

I've been having a nitrate problem for the past 6-8 months and have now resorted to trying a sulphur denitrator in order to keep things under control. I do have 4 big fish but I don't over feed, infact I feed a lot less than I want too. If I feed bare minimum I can keep things under control, but not up to my standards. So my goal is to be able to feed generously and not be worried about Nitrate buildup.

I started talking to Brent Barr in November about building a calcium reactor that I could convert into a nitrate reactor and he was all for it. (almost all my tank equipment, including my sump was built by him) The biggest reason I wanted to use one of his reactors is because I can recirculate the sulphur chamber separately from the calcium chamber which will stop any dissolved calcium from precipitating back out in the sulphur chamber.

I decided that the biggest reactor was the one I wanted to test, this ofcourse may be a bit big, but it should allow for a whole lot of nitrate reduction, and this will be needed as my fish and corals grow even larger. My tank is a 180g, with a 60g sump.

More info on Brent's equipment can be found at his Barr Aquatics website, or on the Austin Oceans website. (they now build and sell all of his designs)

Equipment involved:

Barr Aquatic CR2200 (with water flow meter)
Caribsea LSM (sulphur media)
Gen-X CRM (calcium media)
Aqualifter pump
1/4" tubing

Initial pictures:

http://www.playhardrc.com/misc/aquar...nitrator1s.jpg

2 probe ports:
(ORP & pH)
http://www.playhardrc.com/misc/aquar...nitrator2s.jpg

Media:
http://www.playhardrc.com/misc/aquar...nitrator3s.jpg

Reactor full and ready for action:
http://www.playhardrc.com/misc/aquar...nitrator4s.jpg

I currently have the reactor running full bore on some water I removed from my tank in a water change. I plan to flush it with 'new' tank water in a couple days and then put it online.

Should be interesting...

Looks great. So is Brent making stuff again? When I wanted to buy a skimmer from him a couple years ago he had decided to take a break .. nowadays I know you can get the designs from Austin Aquatics but it's nice to hear he's back in business. He has some neat stuff.

Anyhow, good luck with this. Like that coarse media .. If I wasn't sitting on I think at least 2 containers of ARM I'd try some .. but I have to use this stuff up.

At least I think I can say I learned something with my sulfur denitrator that I hope can spare you some headaches in getting yours going. Although at one month in now and not outputting zero yet (but output is less than input so that's good) I think that it's good that you've oversized it, because despite that people tell me I should have an adequate media volume, the same flowrate into a larger vessel compared to a smaller vessel will be introducing "less O2 by volume" into the anaerobic zone, meaning hopefully a faster cycle.

I guess I can tell you to be suspicious of your test kits, sulfur interferes with them. Nitrites for sure, so don't bother testing nitrite.

Oh one more thought, Randy Holmes-Farley did this one write up where he sort of explains why the calcium from the second stage should be minimal .. (chemical equations and all), but I can tell you in the 8 weeks now of running mine (between the two "trials"), the calcium media in my second stage has gone down at least 2", maybe 3". So while it's theoretically negligible, IME it's non-zero. I haven't bothered testing alkalinity in this tank though as there is nothing in there that it's a huge concern for (corals can't live in nitrate soup). Just my ritteri anemone.

Which sort of leads me to my question for you though ... in my case, the ritteri is this weird nitrate-producing beast that I've learned to live with. Perhaps a stronger skimmer would help me in this regard but I'm curious what skimmer you're running on your system and whether you've given any thought to upgrading or modifications there (i.e., recirculation, gravity feed from raw overflow water, etc., or even just going to a larger skimmer)?

Well Brent isn't into production anymore, he just is doing design now, from my understanding. But he does have a few of this and that left over to sell off. (listed on his website)

I like the coarse calcium media as well, and I'd like to get more coarse sulphur media if I can find some.. I have to do some looking around. I work at a plant in which we make 42 tons of sulpher every day, but I really have no way of 'beading' it. I suppose I could use broken chunks but I'm not sure if that would be very effective.

As for my skimmer, it's a Barr Aquatic SK1620. It works quite well and rated for twice my water volume, so I don't think I am under skimming, but it's amazing how much waste is created by 2 tangs & 2 rabbitfish. (plus various other small fish) I also have a fairly large LT Anenome and a Condy Anenome... plus various corals.

I don't understand this at all... I understand how a Ca reactor works...and I understand how a Nitrate reactor works...but I'm not clear on how/why you've got them together in this case. Or what advantage that brings.

I'll go back and look at my Holmes-Farley stuff, but does the Ca reactor somehow consume O2?

Simply put...

The Nitrate reduction that occurs in the sulphur chamber reduces the pH to a point where the second chamber's calcium will dissolve and raise the pH back up before entering the tank.

A sulfur based denitrator uses aragonite media to buffer the output as it will be low in pH, so it conditions the effluent before being returned to the tank. Any sulfur based reactor has both sulfur media and calcium media, either mixed together as in the case of Caribsea "No-NO3" media, or in separate layers using Caribsea LSM (or other pure elemental sulfur granules) in one layer and a calcium reactor media in the other.

What Psyire (and I) have done with our reactors is use a 2 stage calcium reactor design and use exclusively sulfur in the first stage and exclusively aragonite in the second. Typically a 2 stage reactor uses recirculation on the first stage and single-pass on the second, which I think in the case of an anaerobic bacteria colony would only help with the overall efficacy of the reactor.

A calcium reactor does not consume O2 but uses CO2 to lower the pH to dissolve the aragonite media.

Psyire, what sort of nitrate levels are you running? While I'm excited that you're trying this, on the other hand that's not a heavy bioload for a 180g by any means.. I'm sort of surprised you would be having nitrate accumulation problems ... (bluntly put, you shouldn't be).

Well...

I don't think I should have a nitrate problem either, but I have my theories...

#1, I used 100% base rock for the main display (180lbs). This baserock was from reefer rocks and is extremly porous and looks very nice. However, I believe it might be 'too' porous and not have a big enough oxygen free zone as traditional dense LR from the ocean. This would lead to a reduction in anerobic bacteria and an inherent inability to deal with as much nitrate conversion deep inside the LR.

#2, 1"-2" Sand bed. I did not want to go with a DSB and did not want to go with barebottom (at the time) Now I'm wishing I would have gone BB, as the detritus buildup would not sink into the shallow sand bed. The same problem as noted above essentially... Deep enough to convert to Nitrate, but not further.

Note: I have more tank inhabitants than I posted above, those are just the bigger ones... but you are right, it "should" have been fine. Tank has been setup and running for over a year and a half. Nitrate is anywhere from 50-100 depending on what's going on. (recent water change, etc)

Picture of rock for reference:

http://www.playhardrc.com/misc/aquarium/Baserock2.jpg

Hmm .. interesting. I would have guessed those rocks would be OK but who knows. Well it's just like my situation really, mathematically there's no reason for me to have had nitrates above 50 in the first place but it's been fairly consistent, and I've tried just about every other trick in the book (and gone though at least 4 tank setups as well). I guess sometimes it just happens ...

On the bright side it's down to the mid 20's now and appears to be coming down nicely still.

I'm really interested in this.

Sorry for tons of questions...
1) The sulfer based reaction has no need for low pH or CO2 addition, right?
2) Do you add CO2 to the Ca reaction chamber?
3) Is the Ca reaction chamber recirculated? Is the Nitrate reaction chamber recirculated? Both?
4) Do you have an additional Ca reactor, or is this your only Ca reactor?
5) Why the ORP sensor in the Nitrate chamber? Does the sulpher reaction also need to be in the absence of oxygen? If so, how is oxygen removed from this reactor?
6) Do you attempt to vent the N2 produced?...

Here's what Holmes-Farley had to say about it. I believe this was written in 2003.

Ask away! :) (Not speaking for Psyire of course, but I'm hoping he doesn't mind).

Errr .. yes and no. No as in you don't inject CO2 to lower the pH, but you DO need a zone of "little to no" oxygen (aka "anoxic zone" or "anaerobic zone") for the anaerobic bacteria that reduces nitrate, to take hold. They metabolise the sulfur, consuming the nitrates and releasing nitrogen gas, and sulphates (see your RHF text you quoted). NSW already has sulfate to some degree and there's nothing in the literature to suggest that it's harmful in any way.

No - the absence of oxygen plus the metabolic activities reduce the pH in the reactor, so the water entering the Ca reaction chamber is already with depressed pH.

The Ca reaction chamber is the second stage of a 2 stage calcium reactor. These are almost always single-pass, otherwise you're basically looking at a complete reactor for the second stage. I imagine there is benefit for recirc on this stage but it's fairly atypical thing, based probably mostly on economics. I've been considering making my 2nd stage recirculation at some point but it's not a priority. The flow-through flowrate is very slow.

The nitrate reducing chamber, or the first stage, is recirculated. This part is basically the same as any calcium reactor.

Technically I think you're better off not relying on the denitrator to replenish Ca and Alk on a heavy Ca drawing bioload (ie. SPS, clams, etc.). Personally I have several reactors anyhow as I'm a gear nerd and like trying different things so in my case the answer is "yes I have an additional Ca reactor" but at the moment the tank I run my denitrator on has a very low Ca demand as there are no corals in there for now. So no other reactor on THAT tank but that may change one day.

I can't answer the ORP thing, maybe Psyire can chime in on that one. In my opinion, ORP is a useless number to track unless you're running ozone on your system.

The sulfur reaction does need to be in the absence of oxygen.

Oxygen is removed by cycling the reactor and using a very slow flowrate. Thus, once the oxygen is depleted, very little returns into reactor from the feed.

There is a slight caveat. Once the unit has "cycled completely" and after a period of time the tank nitrates will read zero. At this point you need to increase the flowthrough rate through the reactor so that nitrate can be consumed at the rate it is produced.

So technically you don't want an completely oxygen-free zone, as if you do that, you'll have the wrong chemical reaction take place, and produce H2S instead. Apparently the levels are so low as to generally not be a concern other that it will stink your place to high heaven. But you do want a "low" oxygen zone until your tank is reading zero nitrates and then you rely on a smaller population of bacteria with the faster flowrate.

It is recommended to place the output of the reactor in a high turbulent zone, preferably a sump not the main tank, and above the waterline to aid in gas exchange. Other than that, no special consideration for venting N2 (which is a part of air anyhow), except for that the first stage, i.e. the sulfur stage, should be an upflow so that gas can escape into the second stage (which should also be upflow so gas can escape from there as well). A downflow style will end up with a gas bubble at the top that can't go anywhere.


Hope this helps..