![]()  | 
	
		
 A lighting question 
		
		
		I would like to pick everyone's brains if I can.(actually my kids think I should just pick one and stick with it!) 
	I have a 36" 95G acrylic hex tank. I am at odds how best to light it. As of now I have just a few fish in it, 90" of live rock, and a 4" LSB. I am going to be adding corals, as I feel more confident and learn more about which animals I will add, probably mostly softies, xenia and maybe an anemone if suitable. I am currently running 2x55W PC's, and want to add some MH or Radium. The challenge comes in the available space. Since it is a hex tank, the space I have to work with on the top is approx. 24"(back to front) x 14.5" (each panel is 14.5") If any of you have any suggestions or experience that would help I would be most grateful! Brian  | 
		
 A lighting question 
		
		
		I'd say your choice is simple, one 400W MH bulb in a pendant.  You can keep the pc bulbs for actinic supplementation. 
	 | 
		
 A lighting question 
		
		
		My response is similar to Troy's 
	I would add either a 250w but a 400w would be better because of the depth and keep your pc's and add actinic bulbs in them.BOOM you got your self some decent lighting!  | 
		
 A lighting question 
		
		
		Now that I have seen a radium bulb in action I would never go back to Iwasaki unless it is for a grow out tank.  The Radium bulb really suits a deep hex tank since you don't need any supplemental actinics.  This makes lighting simple.  I am not sure if you can orient the bulb vertically but you have enough width for a horizontal bulb pendant.  And since the radium bulb is really strong in the blue end of the spectrum I found that the light disperses better across and reaches deeper in my tank than the Iwasaki. 
	Good luck.  | 
		
 A lighting question 
		
		
		Clint, how long have you been using the Radium?  What is their life expectancy? 
	 | 
		
 A lighting question 
		
		
		Troy, 
	I have just started using the Radium so life expectancy is a question on my mind too. Hopefully the blueline ballast helps here. You've probably read that they will last about six months with core and coil and 10-12 (even 14) months with a e-ballast. Whether or not a "used" radium still has more blue spectrum than other bulbs is another question. Clint  | 
		
 A lighting question 
		
		
		Thanks Clint.  I actually haven't followed much of the lighting talk lately.  I've seen some pics of the Radium and they sure look great.  Are you using an electronic ballast? 
	 | 
		
 A lighting question 
		
		
		Thanks for the replies. I have to say that's the way I was leaning. 400W 6500k. Would there be any advantage to going to Radium? or two 400W bulbs? 
	Brian  | 
		
 A lighting question 
		
		
		Yeah a 400w blueline E-ballast.  It was back ordered for over 6 months.  The exchange and brokerage broke my bank! 
	I hope someone finds a better alternative to getting stuff from the states. This ballast is probably made in china (it has chinese inspection stickers) and probably costs no more than $30 wholesale! arghh  | 
		
 A lighting question 
		
		
		The advantage in using 2 bulbs would be twice the light but with a 400W bulb you'll have plenty of light.  I think you'd be wasting a second bulb because of the light spread.  The Radium bulb is a much more pleasing colour of bulb than the Iwasaki.  With a Radium you could forgo the supplemental actinics. 
	EDIT: I should add that the trade off when using the Radium over the Iwasaki is bulb life and intensity. [ 10 August 2002, 12:44: Message edited by: Troy F ]  | 
		
 A lighting question 
		
		
		What was the final at your door price of the blueline? 
	 | 
		
 A lighting question 
		
		
		I would also be interested in the to your door cost of your Blue line e`s Clint,ive been considering them for sometime. 
	They supposedly will burn ushio 10k`s much more efficient in bulb life and spectrum. Marc.  | 
		
 A lighting question 
		
		
		If you really want to know...  
	bill from champion ballast 159.90 US (266.5 cdn) freight 18.00 US (30.0 cdn) + UPS brokerage ~$80.0 cdn Total = $ 376.5 sighhhhh  | 
		
 A lighting question 
		
		
		:eek:   
	Thanks Clint,it just might have to wait a bit longer...i would need 3. :rolleyes: Marc.  | 
| All times are GMT. The time now is 01:49 PM. | 
	Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.