Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board

Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board (http://www.canreef.com/vbulletin/index.php)
-   Reef (http://www.canreef.com/vbulletin/forumdisplay.php?f=8)
-   -   What salt do you use? (http://www.canreef.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=20316)

Reefhawk1 11-17-2005 07:54 PM

What salt do you use?
 
Hi everyone,

I wanted to ask you what type of salt mix do you use in your reef or fowler tanks?

And has anyone used Seachems reefsalt ?

All input would be appreciated.

Thanks

Joe Reefer 11-17-2005 08:15 PM

Reef Crystals here. :smile:

saltynuts 11-17-2005 08:29 PM

salt
 
Io here have never had any problems with it.

SeaHorse_Fanatic 11-17-2005 08:35 PM

IO.

rickjames 11-17-2005 08:39 PM

KENT, mixes to the right levels if you use RO/DI water. Was using Instant Ocean but the CA/ALk levels are too low.

scuglass 11-17-2005 08:39 PM

io :cool:

SJSobczyk 11-17-2005 08:45 PM

Reef Crystals!

Steve

christyf5 11-17-2005 08:50 PM

Kent or IO, whichever is available when I need it. :biggrin:

muck 11-17-2005 08:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by christyf5
Kent or IO, whichever is available when I need it. :biggrin:

same for me.. :cool:

vanreefer 11-17-2005 09:27 PM

IO

EmilyB 11-17-2005 09:38 PM

Kent

scub steve 11-17-2005 10:22 PM

IO here but i cant seem to grow anything so i dont know how good my input is

fresh 11-17-2005 10:24 PM

we should have a count of how many times this question gets asked each month ;) just being an a$$

OCDP 11-17-2005 10:54 PM

IO

Switching to Reef Crystals though.

danny zubot 11-17-2005 11:05 PM

reply
 
Reef crystals here. I stopped using tracing elements and other vitamin type suppliments because RC has more of everything you need.

Matt 11-17-2005 11:20 PM

From my reading, IO, Reef Crystals, and Kent salts are all made by the same manufacturer (Aquarium Systems), and apparently test very similarly.

All the subjective considerations of which salt to use are inconsequential, since I doubt any of us have the analytical tools or experience to objectively compare mixes -- especially over a large enough sample to be relevant.

All the major mixes seem to have created successes for many reefers, and pick any mix and you'll find a reasonable number of folks who have switched because another is apparently better.

Availability, price and marketing ability aren't the best measure, IMO.

I use Red Sea, because it was the first one I bought.

Murminator 11-17-2005 11:23 PM

Red Sea.....cause B.A recomeded it :redface:

Bob I 11-18-2005 12:13 AM

Red Sea because the price was right. When that is gone I will use Kent because I have a pail of it.

rickjames 11-18-2005 12:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matt
From my reading, IO, Reef Crystals, and Kent salts are all made by the same manufacturer (Aquarium Systems), and apparently test very similarly.

Not entirely true. IO is formulated to mix with an "average" amount of minerals in water (i.e. tap water). Kent and others are formulated to mix with RO/DI water.

If you mix IO with RO/DI water you end up with about 330 ppm calcium, depending on the specific gravity of the water, and a lower alkalinity.

Matt 11-18-2005 12:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rickjames
Not entirely true. IO is formulated to mix with an "average" amount of minerals in water (i.e. tap water). Kent and others are formulated to mix with RO/DI water.

If you mix IO with RO/DI water you end up with about 330 ppm calcium, depending on the specific gravity of the water, and a lower alkalinity.

Sources? The Aquarium Systems website suggests that it is Reef Crystals that is formulated for tapwater use. The infamous S-15 Report (which uses apparently valid analysis for the mixes, although the scoring system that the sponsor uses to determine what's "best" is completely subjective and self-serving), shows that IO, Kent and RC are all substantially similar, nothwithstanding the marketing data.

Invigor 11-18-2005 01:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rickjames
If you mix IO with RO/DI water you end up with about 330 ppm calcium, depending on the specific gravity of the water, and a lower alkalinity.

I've found that too -- I'm not getting a good reading with IO and ro/di..very low in Ca and Alk.

Reefhawk1 11-18-2005 08:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bob I
Red Sea because the price was right. When that is gone I will use Kent because I have a pail of it.

I use Red Sea as well. Price was great on boxing day :biggrin:

reeferaddict 11-18-2005 10:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Invigor
Quote:

Originally Posted by rickjames
If you mix IO with RO/DI water you end up with about 330 ppm calcium, depending on the specific gravity of the water, and a lower alkalinity.

I've found that too -- I'm not getting a good reading with IO and ro/di..very low in Ca and Alk.

Ditto! - Now I mix my RO/DI with Kent Osmoprep then with Kent Salt and I get 420 ppm Ca+ and 11 dKH... IO was 360 and 7 ... and 330 and about 5 with straight RO/DI... :mrgreen:

danny zubot 11-18-2005 02:47 PM

reply
 
Why don't we get a few more comparisons, I'm finding this interesting. I'm going to do a water change this weekend with reef crystal in RODI water. I'll measure and report my CA and ALK readings as well.

rickjames 11-18-2005 02:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Matt
Quote:

Originally Posted by rickjames
Not entirely true. IO is formulated to mix with an "average" amount of minerals in water (i.e. tap water). Kent and others are formulated to mix with RO/DI water.

If you mix IO with RO/DI water you end up with about 330 ppm calcium, depending on the specific gravity of the water, and a lower alkalinity.

Sources? The Aquarium Systems website suggests that it is Reef Crystals that is formulated for tapwater use. The infamous S-15 Report (which uses apparently valid analysis for the mixes, although the scoring system that the sponsor uses to determine what's "best" is completely subjective and self-serving), shows that IO, Kent and RC are all substantially similar, nothwithstanding the marketing data.

My sources are personal experience using salifert test kits. Anthony Calfo also mentioned it in a water change thread on reef central a while. As well it appears that others on the board have noticed this.

rickjames 11-18-2005 02:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by reeferaddict
Quote:

Originally Posted by Invigor
Quote:

Originally Posted by rickjames
If you mix IO with RO/DI water you end up with about 330 ppm calcium, depending on the specific gravity of the water, and a lower alkalinity.

I've found that too -- I'm not getting a good reading with IO and ro/di..very low in Ca and Alk.

Ditto! - Now I mix my RO/DI with Kent Osmoprep then with Kent Salt and I get 420 ppm Ca+ and 11 dKH... IO was 360 and 7 ... and 330 and about 5 with straight RO/DI... :mrgreen:

Hey how much osmoprep do you use with the kent mix? I have a container of the stuff sitting around, maybe I should use it up.

Abbyreefer 11-18-2005 04:02 PM

I used to use IO as well and switched to Kent for the same reasons (ca and alk were low) better now with Kent.

DiscusZ 11-25-2005 03:36 PM

I am using IO and I am switching to Kent today (well picking up a pail)

Jim

Aquattro 11-25-2005 08:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Abbyreefer
I used to use IO as well and switched to Kent for the same reasons (ca and alk were low) better now with Kent.

Same here

marie 11-25-2005 10:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Abbyreefer
I used to use IO as well and switched to Kent for the same reasons (ca and alk were low) better now with Kent.

I haven't found IO so low the levels can't be easily raised with additives, I don't like keeping my ca and alk too high because of mineral build up in powerheads. I keep my calcium around 380 and my alk at 9 dkh and the corals don't seem to suffer :biggrin:

Dolf 11-25-2005 11:57 PM

I used to use Kent when I had a reef years ago. Now I have IO. I just found a very interesting site with all of the info about what each mix contains. Go to http://www.advancedaquarist.com/2005/11/aafeature1 to read the full article. Another interesting part of the study was the yield of a 50 Gal bag standardized to a salinity of 35 ppt. Kent yielded 42.2 Gal, Aquamedic and Oceaniac 42.29 and 42.96 Gal while IO provided a yield of 45.13 Gal. Seems to me that this amounts to 5-7% more salt for the $$$’s than most other salts. Take a look at the heavy metals and such and let me know your thoughts. (I am lazy and have not had the time to study the report the way I should.:mrgreen: )


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:28 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.