Danny,
Are you serious... you aren't familiar with my work? Canreef isn't that big of a place; some of the members here helped vote my tank up to "thread of the month" on reefcentral a little while back. And the other day I called the owner of www.nanotuners.com in the States and he told me I was "a legend" down there. Get with the times man... c'mon, a legend!

- Chad

reply
 

Sorry dude, I haven't had the time at work to read that novel!:wink:

Haha touche. Well, the coles notes version is that one of the modifications that I made was to put a submersible light inside the cannister filter.

- Chad

I'll jump.

Beverly's reefs are probably three of the best looking reefs I've seen. Zero clutter in the tanks, they are VERY clean, all the corals are very healthy, and the fish didnt looked stressed at all. Also, I remember the tanks, and water looking VERY clear, which, not to say its a bad thing, but doesnt seem to be the case in every tank.

Chris

I will second that, Bev's reefs are fantastic! Mind you Harvy's 33 gal cube (now no longer, sob sob sob) was the #1 reef I've seen and I believe he is a gadget geek. That said what really makes a good looking reef, is the the aquascaping. You can have a tank full of mushrooms, xenia, polyps, some shrimp and few damsels or clowns - if properly aquascaped it will look like a million bucks (whatever that means). Having said all this, I think a skimmer can be good and can be bad. I have an alveopora, it was not doing well until I removed my skimmer. That said, when I first started the tank, I had an algae growth in the water column problem (like not see you hand in the tank unless it was touching the glass 'algae growth in the water column problem') and I could not, for the life of me, change enough water to get it out. My trusty skimmer and 9 hours, BAM! Clean as a whistle!

So, everything in moderation...

-Pauli

Yes Bev, but how much extra work has not having a skimmer cost you? mind you I think you have a little bit of Obsessive/compulsive going on anyways with your water changes and tank maintenance so it probably works for you, but for normal people who don't want there tanks to consume there whole life.....:mrgreen:

Sorry Bob, I can't back you on this one.. I tried your "skimmer-less" ideal for the last 6 months as I figured what the heck I am building a new one anyways.. anyhow.. algae ran out of control, water changes went from 10% a month to about 50% a week personal maintenance went to a daily thing instead of every month.. sorry I don't have the time to not run a skimmer.

to replace a skimmer you need more than just 1 thing up there for example a Skimmer will:

remove dissolved organics = Carbon
remove undissolved stuff = mechanical filter
remove nitrates by removing the stuff that causes them in the first place = mechanical filter + live rock/sand bed/fluidized filter

OK now you still have other benefits that you will be missing.. a all in one solution, aeration of the water with out air stones or excessive surface movement which leads to salt creep, extra water flow.. ect..

for what it is worth there are ways to stop a skimmer from putting bubbles into a tank so that should never be an issue. and sense a skimmer is basically a closed loop there is no reasons for floods if you use some common sense and chose your skimmer and set up with what you want to achieve in mind.

Steve

Steve,

FWIW, quoted from http://www.nimh.nih.gov/HealthInformation/ocdmenu.cfm ....

Yes, it may be funny to some people to obliquely infer that someone who has different reefkeeping methods from one's own as mentally ill. I can assure you, however, that among my human frailties and health issues, OCD is not among them. I would be insulted for myself and for others who do weekly tank maintenance if I didn't think your comments come from either ignorance of the serious nature of OCD and other mental illnesses, or if you just wanted to yank my chain, or both.


Anyway, on to other matters.....

What good does a monthly 10% water change do for your tank? Why even bother with water changes at all when they are so infrequent and small? I know a guy at the lfs who boasts he hasn't done a water change in three years and has shown me pics on the web to prove his corals' health. You've got all the gadgets and know how to pull off something like this. Why not do what he does?

For that matter, what good does a measly weekly 15% water change do for my tanks? It certainly does not raise my alk, Ca or Mg, and if I had nitrate/phosphate issues, 15% a week wouldn't even begin to address them. I've read that doing frequent water changes replenishes trace elements, but I have no way of testing to know if that's true. I've also read that doing frequent water changes adds heavy metals from the salt mix into the tank, which, over time, can be unhealthy for a tank's inhabitants. Again, I have no real way to test this either.

I think the real issue at hand is that comparing my tank and my maintenance regime to your tank and your maintenance regime is comparing apples to oranges. You have chosen one way to keep a reef and I have chosen another. IMO, what works for each of us, if indeed our maintenance regimes are doing what we claim they do, should be good enough.

Cheers to all reefers!

Just wanted to comment on finicky skimmers, micro bubbles and floods.

1. For hang-on skimmers, you unfortunately have a small risk here, but mitigate it by using high quality designs like Remoras and this should not be a problem. For in-sump skimmers, proper sump design will eliminate micro bubbles. You need to allow enough space for the bubbles to rise and pop, baffles help as well.

2. For floods because of a skimmer overflowing, just drill the collection cup high up and emptly it into a 5g bucket for it to overflow into.

3. Some skimmers do require lots of tuning for initial setup. But I think this setup time is less than the time required to maintain a non-skimmer setup. If you have to keep tuning your skimmer, then something keeps changing in your reef, likely inconsistant water level, and dosing your tank with different products.

Bev's skimmerless tanks work for her and that is great. She does have very nice tanks, they are beautiful and really quiet which is nice.

But she has trade-offs too. She keeps her bioload really low, does tons of tank maintenance and runs bare bottom.

So a reefer has to figure out if they are willing to make this trade-off or not. I know I am not, I like high bioloads and the look of a sand bottom and try to keep maintenance to a minimum. For the bulk of reefers, and especially those just getting into the hobby I think a skimmer is essential.

Rory,

Thanks for the compliments :biggrin:

Low bioload is only one reason I keep fewer fish than most people. The other, and probably more important reason, is to not be a heavy consumer of wild fish populations. I've talked at length about this consumer issue on other recent threads, one of which is the LFS debate.

You're welcome, you deserve it, your obviously care for and care about your reefs a great deal.