to who exactly, you? dude i agree with you but you gave up a long time ago contributing anything meaningful to conversation around here, your just annoying now.

This sentence...
...is a blatant accusation, IMO.

And this sentence...
...is indicative of indecisiveness, uncertainty and self doubt, and contradicts the first sentence....which are all traits of argumentativeness, IMO.

I think the tank looks nice, he's doing his best to house his fish, hasn't overcrowded....and why would he photoshop a Tang into his 30g??? Listen to yourself! He didn't come here asking what anyone thought about him having a Yellow tang in a 30g tank ...he was introducing himself and was open to ideas on reefing...in the end he does plan to enlarge the tank...his fish is small...and hey I have a Purple Tang in a 50g and a Kole Tang in my 65g tall hex reef...they are both doing very very well, not on the "recommended size for species" but.... Good luck to you Genix...keep up the nice tank.

I bet there is more like 30 opinions. I think the point a lot of people miss is that science is all about not knowing. You get some results and you try to make a case to support your interpretation of the data. The really amusing aspect of this particular situation is that there are very few people that would argue with his basic point (including genix) but the way he tries to make his case POs everybody and he gets shouted down.

Please leave the personal insults & attacks out of the threads
Thanks.