Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board

Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board (http://www.canreef.com/vbulletin/index.php)
-   Reef (http://www.canreef.com/vbulletin/forumdisplay.php?f=8)
-   -   What's the TDS readings of your source water? (http://www.canreef.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=8557)

Bryan 03-17-2004 02:41 AM

10-14 in downtown Vancouver

Aquattro 03-17-2004 02:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Namscam
isnt a lower number the better.

No, a lower number means less total dissolved solids. That's salts , in all their forms. These salts (minerals) aren't used to determine DW quality. Things like PO4, NO3, Si, organic carbons, etc are used to determine drinking water quality. You'll have to have a lab analysis to determine what your water quality is, as we don't have test kits for the bad stuff.

go here to have a look.

http://www.ec.gc.ca/water/en/manage/qual/e_measur.htm

chwkreefer 03-17-2004 04:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Namscam
y do some ppl say they have the best drinking water when their numbers cant even come close to that in BC...???isnt a lower number the better....
unless they arent talking bout drinking water and is talking bout how good their water is good for a swimming poool .. you dont need to add chlorine..its instant Cl.

That's funny.

I would have thought that the better or best water would have a low TDS count. I know part of the testing is subjective in regards to taste.

Now where I live we are actually on a seperate aquaduct, we aren't tapped into Chilliwack's main supply, but we are quite close by so my numbers actually shocked me abit. That's partly why I wanted to get results from other people.

BC definitely has got some great water.

Lofus 03-17-2004 06:38 PM

Calgary gets its water from the Elbow river.

There are a lot of factors that go into water flavour, TDS, mineral and ion content.

Low TDS does not really equate to better taste. Just try some RO or distilled water. Some of it can be pretty nasty.

Quinn 03-17-2004 06:42 PM

I'm no hydrologist but I doubt taste has anything to do with purity. Isn't pure lab-grade H2O supposed to be bad for you? And everyone runs around paying money for water from glaciers, water that has been sitting for 10,000 years. Maybe it gets better with age.

chwkreefer 03-17-2004 08:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by teevee
I'm no hydrologist but I doubt taste has anything to do with purity. Isn't pure lab-grade H2O supposed to be bad for you? And everyone runs around paying money for water from glaciers, water that has been sitting for 10,000 years. Maybe it gets better with age.

Oh the taste thing was in reference to different conpetitions that Chilliwack has won. So you are correct that it has nothing to do with purity.

The aquafir that supplies the water out here has tested for low nitrate and low microbial contamination. So I guess that explains why TDS readings don't indicate everything about our water.

I know that Chilliwacks water boasts it has half the contaminats of bottled water. So other than paying for the fancy blue bottle, I'd be wasting money paying for the bottle water that isn't as good as the water coming out of our local taps.

Quinn 03-17-2004 08:27 PM

I've always considered bottled water a scam. In Europe, Dasani comes from London's public water supply, and Toronto is talking about bottling and selling their water as well.

Delphinus 03-17-2004 08:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lofus
Calgary gets its water from the Elbow river.

FWIW, "south" Calgary gets its water from the Elbow. North gets it from the Bow. You'd think they'd be fairly similar but I seem to recall the last time I ever looked into this they were surprisingly distinct.

Not that it matters, it's more just something of an observation I find interesting.

dyereefer 03-18-2004 12:33 AM

I live in surrey and the TDS=8

ruck'n'reefer 03-18-2004 04:11 AM

110 pre RO, clearbrook waterworks, Abbotsford


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:54 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.