Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board

Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board (http://www.canreef.com/vbulletin/index.php)
-   Reef (http://www.canreef.com/vbulletin/forumdisplay.php?f=8)
-   -   Strictly T5 thread (http://www.canreef.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=50915)

digital-audiophile 03-24-2009 07:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aquattro (Post 403321)
Greg, you KNOW what you need....don't fight it.

I fight the brave fight ;)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Treebeard (Post 403320)
I have been meaning to ask this question for sometime now, and this thread is the ideal place to ask.

From what I have read, T5 bulbs should be replaced approximately every 12 months. Why?? Is this based on quantitative measurements, or is it because Joe's Fish Store needs to sell you new bulbs once a year for his kids college fund?

On the zeo system KZ actually recommends that you replace your bulbs every 6 months :neutral: I really think this is overkill.

A year seems to be ok but they do really lose a great amount of par.. I need to find the post by ihavecrabs, he did some par readings on his old T5's just before he changed them and then the new readings, it was really a big difference.

Treebeard 03-24-2009 07:50 PM

That is enough proof for me.

Quote:

Originally Posted by digital-audiophile (Post 403323)
A year seems to be ok but they do really lose a great amount of par.. I need to find the post by ihavecrabs, he did some par readings on his old T5's just before he changed them and then the new readings, it was really a big difference.


digital-audiophile 03-24-2009 07:52 PM

I found the thread

http://canreef.com/vbulletin/showthr...&highlight=par

a big loss in par over 10 months.

banditpowdercoat 03-24-2009 08:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Leah (Post 403277)
That is how my 4 bulb is set up as well. Why are you switching out the bulbs? Are they
better do you think? I like how mine look as well it is on my reef tank. I just replaced to
of the 4 bulbs. 1 Actinic+ and 1 Midday. Last year I just replaced all bulbs at once. Did
not know any different. I am such a chicken to try new things. I would love to see how yours looks.
Thanks BPC


Leah, I went with the Geismann Bulbs when I got my TEK light, at the advice of Wendell, @ Ocean Aquatics. Myka was the one who told me she had the same bulbs as we do, and swapped to the Korallen-Zucht Fiji Purple and AquaScience 17500K. Said she liked them better. So, I figured, what the heck. It's been about 12 months on these bulbs now, so they all need a change. I should maybe change 2 at a time, spread the cost out a bit. But I know I'll screw that up LOL. So, I'll just change all 4 at once, keep it simple

Canadian 03-24-2009 08:40 PM

Keep in mind that PAR drop reported by ihavecrabs is with a fixture that isn't actively cooled. Of course you're going to burn the schnikeys out of the lamps without active cooling (in addition to getting lower PAR values). You're better off going with a higher quality fixture than a TEK because in the long run your lamp replacement costs will outweigh the up-front difference in the cost of the fixture. Comparing a TEK fixture to something like an ATI, Sfilligoi, Fauna Marin, etc. is like comparing a Seaclone to BK. I'm sure there is obviously some PAR drop in the better fixtures but I doubt it's as rapid as the uncooled TEK and comparable fixtures. This is one of those cases (similar to skimmers) where you really get what you pay for.

I'm going to have to get a PAR meter so I can monitor the PAR changes in an actively cooled fixture.

Quote:

Originally Posted by digital-audiophile (Post 403325)
I found the thread

http://canreef.com/vbulletin/showthr...&highlight=par

a big loss in par over 10 months.


lorenz0 03-24-2009 08:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Canadian (Post 403351)
Keep in mind that PAR drop reported by ihavecrabs is with a fixture that isn't actively cooled. Of course you're going to burn the schnikeys out of the lamps without active cooling (in addition to getting lower PAR values). You're better off going with a higher quality fixture than a TEK because in the long run your lamp replacement costs will outweigh the up-front difference in the cost of the fixture. Comparing a TEK fixture to something like an ATI, Sfilligoi, Fauna Marin, etc. is like comparing a Seaclone to BK. I'm sure there is obviously some PAR drop in the better fixtures but I doubt it's as rapid as the uncooled TEK and comparable fixtures. This is one of those cases (similar to skimmers) where you really get what you pay for.

I'm going to have to get a PAR meter so I can monitor the PAR changes in an actively cooled fixture.

Thats a very good point which is why i have been debating swapping out my TEK for a powermodual down the road, also the 8 bulb power modual is close to the same size as the 6 bulb TEK light. But yes active cooling plays a big part when it comes to the life span of the bulbs but for most people the TEK is not that bad of a fixture.

digital-audiophile 03-24-2009 09:29 PM

Cool, before I go and spend the extra bucks on a ferrari T5 fixture it would be nice to see the par drop in a XXXX time span as compared to the TEK's. :)

lorenz0 03-24-2009 09:42 PM

you can get a similar effect by running a fan across the bulbs on a TEK

Ryan 03-24-2009 09:47 PM

I think this is a great thread. We need a thread with just pictures of the tank (FTS) with the combos of lights. This would be a big help also.

banditpowdercoat 03-24-2009 09:51 PM

WHAT!!?? I thought my TEK light was one of the good ones??? Almost $500 with bulbs. active cooling now??? I can't win for trying.


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:06 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.