![]() |
bah humbug
|
+1 to the fact that it's hard for humans to grasp the concept of infinity.
I never used to think much of the stars. Then I had to take an astrology course in college and found out that what we see could really be gone. (the ammount of time it takes for the light from the star/planet to travel to our eyes...LIGHT YEARS). It's alot more complex, but basically, when you look up, there's a good chance that the stars you are seeing are already burned out. RAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAD! |
Quote:
|
I think our society should decide that the world will end in 4044. Let's go with April 1st of that year. Um, let's say the planets will all collide, and maybe a star or two will burn out close to our solar system...Anything else we could add? We could call it the Canreef Prediction...
Let the teens of 4040 start their freak out - LOL |
Quote:
Higgs boson my a** Thats the problem with the bloody scientists ...always making sh*t up and people believe them. |
The world will not end simply because human beings disappear from it. The world did just fine for millions of years before we showed up and will do just fine without us, even better perhaps.
|
Here's a webcam page for the Hadron collider:
http://www.cyriak.co.uk/lhc/lhc-webcams.html Check it out, it's really neat! |
Quote:
|
The whole 2012 thing will probably become the latest armageddon 'fad' when the hype & marketing surrounding Roland Emmerich's movie '2012' gets underway later this year.
It's an interesting looking movie staring John Cussack, with quite a few of the VFX shots done at Bridge Studios in Burnaby, BC. 2012 Movie Link . |
Does this mean as tax payers we wont have to pay for the 2010 Olympic? Thats the best news in months.
Tom R |
All times are GMT. The time now is 01:07 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.