![]() |
you can compare the vials by doing a "test" using each with ro, no reagent. I've ran it a couple of times, different order and always get zero.
|
I always use a tissue to grab the vial. Finger prints are enough to throw the whole reading away. Alongside, one tiny floating particle in the vial is also enough to give you false reading. And the worst part is the 3 min shut down time. I don't know what the people at hanna was thinking? I guess according to them, its "cost effective" to throw away a dissolved solution than to change a battery for adding an extra minute to the shut off time, not to mention the dedication to pour the powder in and the two minutes shaking time. I really hate this photometer from the bottom of my heart but well, if I get everything 100% right, I know I am going to get a much more reliable reading than any other test kits. But reaching the 100% takes a lot of work and luck too.
|
Quote:
why else would they give us two lol? |
Geez guys, it is really not that hard... I only use one vial, and always get it completely mixed every time. Like I said, just have to do it right as described above, and it is then very accurate and consistent.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
i wish hanna would sell a little canister with spoon similar to what elos does.
|
Quote:
Having said that the phosphorous ULR checker does seem to be pretty reliable for me. It uses the same process as the phosphate but measures phosphorous; then you do some simple math to estimate your phosphate concentrations. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:33 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.