![]() |
1- You said %90 of your live rock is 6 months old.Considering that you bought it from LFS - it is slower but die off inside newly shipped LR may last 3 to 6 months. OK water parameters don't show that cycle is totaly over. Living organisms have organic phosphate. Sand bed and anaerobic places inside LR are good harbours for phosphates but at he end it is thrown out. Thats why it is not advised to add SPS before 6 months.
2- These are the fishes that i saw in your pictures; 4 chromis, 1 sixline wrasse, 1 damsel, 1 mandarine,1 orange shoulder tang, 1 Kole Tang-probably- , 1 ocellaris clown. Did you keep them all at the same time in a 30 gallon? Don't get me wrong i am not trying to be a tang police this is not a proper tank size for tang issue. But those guys are swimmers. Even if they are small they consume alot of oxygen , add alot of CO2 into the water, eat alot and poop alot. 3- Protein Skimmers like Deltec, ER, Schuran etc. can eliminate the particulate matter as well as organic matter.Coralife skimmers may be good for their price but they can only eliminate the organic matter. How do you get rid of the particules in the water that create nitrates and phosphates? 4- Let me bash your sand as well :) Your sand does not look like aragonite. It is gray and coarser than sea floor grade. I don't know what type of sand it is but some types of sand leach slicates in to water and cause excessive algae growth. Also coarser sand is a detritus trap. Thats why crashed coral is called as detritus trap. 5- Whatever i can see from the picture your rocks are piled in the centre. You have two spray bars on the sides and a Hydor coralia close to the surface. I believe you have a good water flow around the rock work and corals. How do you get rid of the crap from the rocks accumulating at the bottom. i kept a bare bottom 65 gal tank with 700 gal/hr return pump and a 2500 gal/hr closed loop pump. It was hell of a lot of flow for a 65 gal. Despite that the strong flow i had to syphon out lots of crap every week. It is hard to figure it out with a sand bed but too much crap comes out of LR, for me i is worse than fish excrete or excess food.Hobyists having BB tanks must have observed the samething. If you don't have any kind of mechanical filteration where did all that crap go? My guess; if you kept all that fish at the same time you added too many fish in a 30 gal before the rocks fully cured and the tank matured. You tried to handle that bioload with a CL skimmer.It looks like you don't have anything to elimiate particules. If you don't have any flow pushing the detritus under the rock work and your sand is as coarse as it seems in the pictures probably all that crap was trapped by the sand. Nitrate and phosphate levels look allright but i would think about if this is because of the efficient filteration or consumption of GHA. |
Kadaytar,
None of my rock is from any LFS, I never said that... There only used to be 3 fish in the system up until about 2 weeks ago when my 90g crashed, there are an excess of fish in the system now because I am waiting for a home for them. The algae problem was around long before the extra fish. The three original fish, orange shoulder, kole, and sixline, were added to the tank to prepare them for my upgrade. The orange shoulder at the time was less then 0.5", same as the kole. They aren't being housed long term in the nano, it was only to get them used to the flow. The coralife skimmer came with the system, its doing well for me now. I have been looking for an alternatie, but space is at a premium at the moment. I run filtersocks, and do 2 water changes of 5g per week. My sand is black tidal sand by Seachem. I found research that contradicted what others have posted. I also keep my sand well turned over, I have a lipstick conch, bumblebee snails, and a few other miscelanious snails which keep the sand bed clean and turned over regularly. My rocks are actually piled up in a maze of caves with loc-line running within the caves between for flow. There is about a 2" gap between the back wall and the rock to allow for better water movement. I doubt the algae problem comes from the fish, while they may now contribute to it, they weren't there when it started. The rocks and all the items in the tank are fully cured. Remember everything came from my 230g or previous tanks, corals and clams included. Why would I want flow to push detritus under the rockwork? I don't want it to be built up to cause problems. |
andrewsk,
I've looked at both WWM, and read what Anthony Calfo wrote before. They are just two opinions. I've read both descenting, and confirming opinions. I said I will consider the sandbed as a possible source, but I'm not yet prepared to remove it without first understanding why I should. As to answer the natural light question. For the last month there has been 0 natural light getting to the tank. I now keep my blinds closed all day, every day. Marie, Thank you for the photos! |
Catherine, don't give up the battle as I said earlier it takes a lot of patience and perseverance. i still insist once it takes hold it needs very little in the way of nutrients to survive.
When I had the hair algae and it was really bad, you couldn't tell that I had any rocks they were so covered. (For some reason my camera always goes missing when my tank looks really bad :razz: ) I finally fought the battle over the long term by letting the algae grow really long (it is easier to manually remove when its long) siphon it all out and then place all the crabs, snails and urchins directly onto the short stubs that is left. It took a long time for me but eventually I won... only to be taken over by dictyota but thats another story :razz: |
Quote:
I'll give it until September/October, see what happens, and then maybe revisit the idea of removing the sandbed, and swapping out rocks. I'll try the magnesium method, see how that treats me, then just kind of sit back and wait. I really enjoyed the 10-15 minutes per week of maintence I used to enjoy. |
Best of luck, Catherine! I hope it disappears for ya :)
|
Catharine i read this awhile ago from several reefers and I never tried it until last month and I can confirm that this undisputedly worked for me.
I had 5 patches of GHA that would not go away. My rabbitfish stopped eating it as soon as it learned that nori tasted much better. So I finally tried this method which is applying hot boiling water directly onto the GHA. Initiallly I tried doing it with a turkey baster several times before and didn't work well because the hot gases in the baster pushed out the hot water as soon as i sucked it up and lifted it out of the hot water container. I finally got one of the flexible rubbermaid containers that looks like this: http://www.rubbermaid.com/rubbermaid...ct/3160_sm.jpg I removed the white straw tab on the cap and you will see a hole on the cap that lets the liquid out into the white straw tab. This hole will fit a 1/4" flexible hose very snugly. Insert a hose that is long enough to manuever under and around rocks. Turn off all tank water circulation devices. Pour hot boiling scalding hot water into the bottle, cap it up, Turn the bottle upside down into your tank, and squirt the hot water all over a good sized patch of GHA. Squirt slowly so the hot water "lingers" on the GHA. Depending on your tank size, I would consider target one rock at a time. Continue doing this until you've targeted all your rocks and then start again from the beginning. You will start seeting GHA shedding off the next day so make sure you clean the powerhead intakes or overflow intakes. Keep your skimmer skimming WET! this will ensure the dying GHA doesn't fuel more nutrients into your tank. If you have corals nearby, move them before doing this if you are concerned. My acros didn't seem to care or mind when I did it when them nearby. Some people will argue that this will kill your liverock's bacteria. I will argue that it will kill your GHA and some bacteria on the surface under the GHA but your liverock's inside bacteria will be fine. Similarly, this product could work too but harder to apply under rocks without the hose attachment. http://www.rubbermaid.com/rubbermaid...ct/7f82_sm.jpg Seriously, try this method first. If you are apprehensive, do it to one or two rocks first. My GHA patches disappeared after a week and I am currently GHA free. |
As i am too, a happy BB tank owner i second Kadaytar's comments re:sand, skimmer and flow.
I would get rid of the CrapTrap i.e. sand for sure. even though you do have sand sifters, detritus is still there and lots of it. It will not go away unless syphoned out. I was not in favor of BB tank myself before, but OMG how much crap is trapped in that sand ! I only have 1 tiny Tang, one clown and few tiny gobyes in my 60gal, but still a LOT of detritus needs to be syphoned every week. And that is with enormous ammount of flow and decent skimmer. JM2CW |
-that hot water in water bottle technique sounds reasonable and i would try it but the patches of algae are 2'' above my condy anemone, so i'm a little apprehensive @ the moment-
|
i second the boiling water as well. i got rid of a bryopsis problem with that method.
|
plenty of room
Quote:
|
Thanks Chin_Lee I'll take a look around for a bottle like that, and maybe I'll try it this week.
There is however some good news. I think its pretty safe to say that there is no more nutrients feeding the GHA. I say this because any of the places that the urchin has cleaned have remained cleaned for 2 weeks now. The algae does not regrow after Lurchin' Urch has cleaned an area. |
thats the proble
Quote:
|
reply
I went through somthing similar to what you are experiencing but to lesser degree it seems. I tried the sea hare route and similar results as many others; the power heads got them. I will vouch for Drew's sea hare though, it did a wonderful job after I rescued it from a power head. :mrgreen:
Its encouraging to hear that the areas your urchin has cleaned are staying cleaned. So far, my tank is staying GHA free after I eventually over hauled it. My problem was an extreme bio load, which I've since cut in half. How many fish do you have in your tank? |
I do currently have a high number of fish in the tank, but originally I just had 3. I hope to return to the 3-4 mark in the next week or so. The current fish are:
tiny orange shoulder tang 1" (going) tiny kole tang 1" (going) ocellaris clown (going) yellow damsel (going) sixline wrasse green clown goby psychadelic mandarin 4x blue chromis ~0.25-0.5" (probably going) The tangs came to me quite small, needing to be plumped up and accustomed to higher flow. They were originally supposed to go to a 150g, which was supposed to replace the 90g before the crash. They are two of my fish that I want in my big tank (1000+g) which I hope to start in December, or possibly January of the new year. Most of the extra fish are from the 90g crash, and I'm pretty picky about finding them good homes. |
what
send me a pic of the tangs i need some fish!!!
|
Quote:
http://www.canreef.com/vbulletin/sho...t=32184&page=2 |
reply
I think ditching some of those fish would definately help, especially the chromis.
|
add a couple of Sea Hare's.....
See my tank Journal post. They're mowing down GHA like crazy..... |
Quote:
|
i really want to get a sea hare from ocean aquatics to mow down my hair algae, but the only rock that needs algae control is the one that my big condy anemone is attached too, so the anemone might sting and kill the sea hare right? :neutral:
|
Sorry, I don't know much about seahares other then what I've read. I know even less about what interactions may occure between a seahare and an anemone. You may want to try posting a new thread with that question.
|
-ya I waz just reading about them yesterday, and how they release some toxic purple dye when easily stressed, so that kind of kills my interest for one...oh well I guess another 4-5 turbo snails or some margarita snails will have to do..:smile:
|
I had the same problem and tried the same things but in the end, I tried ALGONE at a high dose and the HA dissappeared, simple as that. Good luck!
|
Sea hares & abalone work well on hair algae.
|
Quote:
|
Just so everyone is aware this thread dates back to aug 2007, I think her hair algae problem is beat :mrgreen:
|
Quote:
:lol: |
Thanks guys. Yes the problem was beat a LONG time ago....
What is with people reviving my threads from 2007 this past week? Entertaining, but really strange. |
OK so how did you get rid of the GHA in the end???:question:
|
I moved, and changed tanks at the same time.
|
Hair algae
I had a problem with hair algae as I had inherited the tank from someone who lost interest. I did the water changes the new halide , introduced a algae team of crabs , lawnmower blenie and 2 tangs, Pulled algae from the rocks by hand, and I wasnt winning . I finally pulled out the rocks that were bad and scrubed them with a toothbrush and rinsed them with water change water in my kitchen sink. Took about a month of work as I would do 3-4 rocks a week. By the end of it my yellow tang finished the rest. And then he ate the zenia becuase I had no algae left.
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 04:50 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.