![]() |
To nano or not to nano? That is the question.
dats the Canadian way of spelling it :D
|
To nano or not to nano? That is the question.
Well of course we can all disagree all we want. I am going by my experiences. That is the beauty of this forum. The reader can take all the experiences, and make his own decisions. I am definitely not saying you are wrong, and I am right. :D
|
To nano or not to nano? That is the question.
Nanos, in my experience, are more difficult in the beginning due to the fluctuations in EVERY aspect possible. However, once they are stabalized, they are usually easy to maintain.
I have found it more difficult to keep a nano when adding fish due to the waste buildup. There is less room for the 'lazy' factor in not doing that clean-up or water change. In this aspect, it is easier to keep a 180 gallon tank since the volume of water is more forgiving. To answer the question about fish for a nano, I would add something in the goby family. Clown/Citron goby, catalina goby, six-line wrasse usually do well. However, I would limit it to one to two fish since they have to dispose of what they eat, know what I mean? |
To nano or not to nano? That is the question.
I set up a 7 gallon bowfront at the store about 2 months ago and so far everything is going great.
I'm thinking of setting one up at home. I've got a spare 400W MH sitting around so lighting should not be a problem. :D I think a 7 gallon bowfront nano would look nice sitting on the back of the shitter. [img]smile.gif[/img] |
To nano or not to nano? That is the question.
Quote:
OTOH, I know that Bob has a "proper" DSB in his nano, so I guess that's where it is: as long as it's set up "properly" it can be GoodThing(tm) (oh man I sound like Martha now ... :eek: ) Quote:
Quote:
;) |
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:12 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.