I would tend to agree, but I feel my tank fits the nano category better, as I don't have a sump or other fancy stuff.:redface:

Ya always find a way to fit that in there don'tcha Bob :rolleyes:

Sure, but in this case I feel it applies. Since nano has never really been defined. I may have to go to nanoreef.com to see what they say. BTW the new board has put slashes where there were none before.:sad: You now have one in your signature line.:mrgreen:

Nano reef says that it is 33 gal or less. I think that is almost personal choise.


Brad

Thanks Brad that saves me the trip. Now since my tank measures out to 33 gallons, I am in.:multi::smilecol::onfire:

Not if we decide our own limitations here in the nano forum :p

Back in the old nano-reef.com days it was 20 gal and under is a nano and 2.5 and under was a pico.20 gal and up was considered a (mini) reef,but things changed over the years.

That of course would be your decision, but there is already another picture of a 33 gallon tank, so you would have to kick that one out too. I of course have no problem abiding with your wisdom. Actually I feel a nano is 20 gallons and below. I just like to feel welcome in all forums.:biggrin:

I have alway's considered my tank a Nano, and I have a 28 gallon bowfront.

I was a believer in the 24 inch limit, but apparently the latest craze in Nanos is the 20 long, which I belive is a 30 or 33 inch length.

I would post a pic, but I was member #2004 so I don't have acess to the photo album thingy :(

Just host the pic on nano-reef or something?