Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board

Canreef Aquatics Bulletin Board (http://www.canreef.com/vbulletin/index.php)
-   Reef (http://www.canreef.com/vbulletin/forumdisplay.php?f=8)
-   -   REALLY COOL!!! (http://www.canreef.com/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=13810)

Willow 02-09-2005 06:32 AM

surley it's easier to just have a sump that can take to volume of water from the plumbing and overflow no? nothing to clean and no worries about floods.

EmilyB 02-09-2005 06:39 AM

Tried a check valve once...it sounded horrible. :eek:

danny zubot 02-09-2005 02:24 PM

reply
 
Quote:

surley it's easier to just have a sump that can take to volume of water from the plumbing and overflow no? nothing to clean and no worries about floods.
Agreed, but in this case the return pipe goes to the bottom of the tank, I don't think anyone wants that big of a sump.

doch 02-09-2005 10:09 PM

Precisely. This whole question came up when I decided that I want water flow through the bottom portion of the tank (and have a pump but not a powerhead). As it is now, my 33 will take the drainage if a failure should happen, but 90 gal of water rarely fits in a 33. I like the idea of the hole drilled just below the surface... not sure how I didn't think of that as that is how I have my other return line set up... but that should solve my problem... thanks all!!!

Delphinus 02-09-2005 10:11 PM

Another idea to consider for low lying outputs, is to go closed loop instead of via sump return...

muck 02-09-2005 10:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Delphinus
Another idea to consider for low lying outputs, is to go closed loop instead of via sump return...

Isn't that what I suggested already... :rolleyes:

Thats the way i will be going on my next tank.
Less flow through the sump more flow in the tank. :mrgreen:

doch 02-09-2005 10:15 PM

Call this a stupid question if you will... but what is meant by cloesed loop? An inline pump? If so.. I already have a submersable... and budget is the key word today... so....

muck 02-09-2005 10:27 PM

For a closed loop you would need a seperate pump.
The pump pulls the water out of the tank where ever you put the intake line and puts it back into the tank where ever you put the return line(s).
There is no worry of it overflowing your sump because it doesn't go there.

Tank -> Pump -> Back to Tank

Its a great way to get more flow in your tank without having all sorts of powerheads to clutter it up. You can also drill the bottom of your tank and hide the return line(s) among rock piles or whatnot.

HTH

Delphinus 02-09-2005 11:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by muck
Quote:

Originally Posted by Delphinus
Another idea to consider for low lying outputs, is to go closed loop instead of via sump return...

Isn't that what I suggested already... :rolleyes:

Thats the way i will be going on my next tank.
Less flow through the sump more flow in the tank. :mrgreen:

Sheesh Muck, I was seconding your suggestion... :razz:

monza 02-09-2005 11:55 PM

Don't think that a closed loop guarantees you can plump low and not have your tank drain. At least I would not build my tank that way. Ever had a pump lose a seal or malfunction, I have. On a closed loop with low plumbing I would have drained my entire tank to the floor. IMO it is just a risk having the plumping to low. On my new tank it is drilled high on the back and returns and outlets take a 90 degree bend downwards to what level I want. At the 90 I have the small little holes drilled to break the siphon. I never want to see 340g. on my floor. (knocking on wood)

Dave


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:52 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.